In a long thread of comments attached to my recent posting about Easter, I ventured an opinion that this thread was closed, that I didn’t think blog entries should generate permathreads. Susan expressed good-natured frustration and asked if there were any rules about such things.
Rules in the blogosphere?
Well, the blog owner presumably has a say about how his or her resources get used. I don’t think by allowing comments a blog becomes a common carrier or anything like that. As for the thread in question, I guess I could simply ignore it and let others use it to discuss the topic. I know at least one Sun colleague who makes a point of posting infrequent, thought-provoking articles and then never contributing to the follow-up discussion. Personally I’d rather be discussing what’s happening to the company that’s such a big part of my life (Sun), or pondering depressing questions like this.
In general, a blog reaches a narrower audience than a mailing list. A comment thread on a particular blog entry reaches an even narrower audience: those people who read the blog and are sufficientlyinterested in the top-level entry to dig into the comments. It seems an oddly unproductive use of one’s time to post lengthy contributions which so few people will read, and even more unproductive if you have reason to believe that the blog owner (the one reader you can count on) won’t be sympathetic to your thesis.
Finally, you can always start up your own blog, write an article on your favorite topic, then post a comment to my blog referencing that article. That way, people who really want to debate the symbolic meaning of nails in the Crucifixion can go hog wild, while I can move on to something more important, like whether painting your roof white can save you big bucks on air conditioning….. [Another gem from those good people at BoingBoingBlog.]