Great Monaco GP; shame about the post-race nonsense

Without any real competition from Ferrari, today’s Monaco Grand Prix was a chance for McLaren to put on a splendid show, and they did. Alonso drove beautifully, and Hamilton continued the unprecedented string of performances that are causing people like Jackie Stewart to tip him for true greatness. They lapped all their rivals up to Massa in third place (and Massa himself lapped his team-mate Raikkonen), but they never eased off. It was fascinating to watch the difference in their styles: Alonso was absolutely consistent, lap after lap, while Hamilton was always seeking to push just a little harder, relying on his extraordinary car control to recover when he stepped over the limits.
Having said all that, this was Monaco. Passing is almost impossible. Alonso took the pole, led from the start, and only a mistake would have allowed Hamilton to come in first. But that didn’t stop people from moaning that McLaren had prevented Hamilton from getting the win. From the BBC:

“I’m sure everybody feels – and a lot of people will feel it in England – that there is favouritism or some penalisation that is given to either Lewis or Fernando,” Dennis said.
“We are scrupulously fair at all times in how we run this Grand Prix team.
“This circuit has to be addressed in a team way, and that is why we have won 14 races here.

Exactly. I’m confident that Hamilton is going to win a GP this season, and he has a good shot at the championship. Let’s not get melodramatic.
Speaking of melodramatic, WTF is happening to Ferrari? Paging Ross Brawn. And these super-soft tyres look like a really bad idea.
UPDATE: Oh dear, here come the FIA bureaucrats.

Just when you think it couldn't get any worse….

From TPM:

As if the dynamic of the conflict wasn’t complex enough, U.S. troops are now interceding in a gunfight between Iraqi Interior Ministry forces and employees of U.S. private security firm.
Great.

Words like “incompetence” and “quagmire” seem pathetically inadequate.

The state of philosophy

Mark Vernon has posted an excellent piece on the state of philosophy today. I won’t try to summarize it, because he covers a lot of ground, and I couldn’t do him justice. Moreover the picture is, at times, downright paradoxical. For example, Martha Nussbaum believes that philosophers are doing good, relevant, accessible work, but it isn’t being communicated:

The problem she believes is not philosophy’s: it is the media. ‘Entities such as the New York Times Book Review and other major newspapers are becoming less and less interested in the work of philosophers,’ she says, noting too that the reverse is true in continental Europe and countries like India.

Well, OK. But on the other hand…

… popular philosophy is a growth area in publishing. It is hard to supply precise figures, since many books with philosophical content fall into other categories, but in the UK at least the overall trend for the past 5 years is up. ‘There is something of a backlash against celebrity non-fiction at the moment,’ explains Giles Elliot, charts and media editor at The Bookseller. ‘The book industry is very interested in intellectual non-fiction.’

And I think I’d agree: the amount of space in the biggest bookstores that is devoted to philosophy seems to have grown significantly over the last 20 years.
Anyway, it’s an excellent article which I highly recommend, as well as his interviews with Dan Dennett and others. And like so many thought-provoking pieces, I found it via the RSS feed from Butterflies and Wheels.

Finland has it all

Monty Python underestimated the Finns. I think that at some point in our lives, each of us has hummed a private song just like this….

P.S. Save yourself a minute or so: when the video fades to black, about 90 seconds before the end, that’s it: it’s over. Perhaps the uninterrupted darkness is meant to evoke the Finnish winter…

No surprise here

You scored as Scientific Atheist, These guys rule. I’m not one of them myself, although I play one online. They know the rules of debate, the Laws of Thermodynamics, and can explain evolution in fifty words or less. More concerned with how things ARE than how they should be, these are the people who will bring us into the future.

Scientific Atheist

92%

Militant Atheist

75%

Spiritual Atheist

58%

Apathetic Atheist

50%

Angry Atheist

33%

Agnostic

25%

Theist

17%

What kind of atheist are you?
created with QuizFarm.com

(What about you, Clive?)
[Via PZ, who scored 100% Sci Ath.]

Hitchens on his book

The staff at Beliefnet emailed me (and, presumably, a bunch of other bloggers) to invite us to link to an interview with Christopher Hitchens. ((Do others bloggers get spammed with suggestions as to what they should blog about?)) I read it, and I’m happy to do so: he’s in good form. They also suggested that “my readers” (hello out there!) might enjoy their “Atheist or Believer” quiz. Hmmm… didn’t I take this one a couple of years ago? Let’s see… yep, same questions, including the ridiculously equivocal ones. Anyway, my result was unchanged: Adamant Atheist. What a surprise.

Upgraded to WP2.2

I just upgraded this blog to WordPress 2.2. The only issue that I ran into was that the Category Cloud widget didn’t work until I upgraded from 1.1.1 to 1.3. Otherwise, it was completely painless: deactivate plugins, unpack the distro zip on top of the existing files, run the upgrade.php script, and reactivate plugins. ((Remembering to jot down which plugins I was running before the upgrade…)) No, I didn’t make a backup, although perhaps a zfs snapshot would have been prudent….
As to the new features: having sidebar widgets built-in is nice, and the drag-and-drop widget editor now works properly in Safari. On the other hand, I’m not sure about the new preview mode: it’s more accurate, but I miss having the HTML and output on the same page. We’ll see. Having full ATOM support is most welcome, and overall I think that 2.2 is a clear step forward.