Experiential vs analytical

I keep reading pieces which dismiss concerns about the environmental impact of AI data centers. They typically couple a description of the best-possible data center practices (regardless of whether these are actually being followed) with simplified comparisons of power and water usage of data centers and urban areas.

What bugs me is that these justifications are synthetic. They are analytical rather than experiential.

The typical AI data center is not being built in “a medium-sized town (population of 25,000 to 100,000 people)”. Hell, they couldn’t be – many of them are substantially larger than a town. They’re being built in rural areas, many of which use well water from local aquifers. This means we shouldn’t be asking “what percentage of city residential water usage does a data center use”, but “can the local aquifer and other water sources sustain the additional consumption?”

In many regions (particularly in the west), persistent drought conditions mean that residential and agricultural water users are already under severe pressure to reduce consumption. And yet these areas are attractive sites for data centers because of access to relatively cheap hydroelectric power.

With a rational (nationwide) planning and permitting process, it’s probably feasible to build out a reasonable amount of data center capacity. But that’s not happening. States and communities are competing for the economic benefits (or simply being bribed), and they are fast-tracking the kind of environmental assessments needed to avoid the problems that we’re seeing. Ironically, they are often offering data center developers tax breaks which mean that they cannot afford the infrastructure mitigation that might alleviate these problems.

The result: YouTube is full of stories from local news sources in which families show off the very real impacts of local data center developments. And the most visually compelling images in these stories are polluted water coming from the faucets. And they’re not faked.

And finally, these stories are part of a broad swath of American history, going back to Love Canal in NY, cancer alley in Louisiana, and Erin Brokovich. The vast majority of protests about AI data centers are coming from working class districts, not from Greenpeace and environmental activists. See https://arstechnica.com/…/we-pissed-off-a-lot-of…/

The Coroner’s Report on the Labour Party

This is a long, depressing, blockbuster of a piece.

Back in the 1960s I worked on Labour Party political campaigns as part of their youth group, the Young Socialists. My friends and I were definitely on the left, but still mainstream; it was a shock for me to arrive at university in 1969 and encounter the REALLY hard left of student politics.

But now, Labour is just another center-right party, bought and paid for by the City and Israel. It was obvious when Corbyn was defenestrated, but now we have the documentary proof. Sad, and disgusting.

I’ve decided that I am a Roosevelt Democrat. And you should be too.

When I’m filling in an opinion poll, I am usually asked which party I support. And when I choose Democrat, the next question is “Do you consider yourself a strong Democrat or a weak Democrat?” I always choose Strong, because #reasons, but what I want to say is, “I’m a Roosevelt Democrat, because of fundamental principles.”

So here they are, straight from FDR. (Yes, I’ve verified every quotation.) True last century, maybe even more so today.

“Remember, remember always, that all of us, and you and I especially, are descended from immigrants and revolutionists.”

“The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.”

“The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerated the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than the democratic state itself. That in its essence is fascism: ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or any controlling private power.”

“Freedom means the supremacy of human rights everywhere. Our support goes to those who struggle to gain those rights and keep them. Our strength is our unity of purpose. To that high concept there can be no end save victory.”

“We had to struggle with the old enemies of peace—business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war profiteering. They had begun to consider the Government of the United States as a mere appendage to their own affairs. We know now that Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob.”

“We have learned that we cannot live alone, at peace; that our own well-being is dependent on the well-being of nations far away. We have learned that we must live as men, and not as ostriches nor as dogs in the manger. We have learned to be citizens of the world, members of the human community.”

Who would want to cripple a government cybersecurity org? 🤔

This is obviously not suspicious in any way….

The Cyber Safety Review Board — a Department of Homeland Security investigatory body stood up under a Biden-era cybersecurity executive order to probe major cybersecurity incidents — has been cleared of non-government members as part of a DHS-wide push to cut costs under the Trump administration, according to three people familiar with the matter.

And what was the CSRB looking into?

The terminations will likely delay an ongoing CSRB investigation into the Salt Typhoon hacks, which involved a wide-ranging Chinese infiltration into a number of telecom providers in the U.S. and around the world. The hackers also targeted the communications of a number of high-profile political individuals, including people tied to President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance. 

Yup. Not suspicious at all. Pass the popcorn.

Echos of the 1930s

This is how normalization works.

People are quickly discovering what they once professed to find unacceptable might not be so bad. And it will be felt as a relief. No longer will they have to echo bien-pensant hypocrisies, they can engage in frank, honest assertions of their self-interest.

And:

Plutot Trump que le Wokisme” seems to be the slogan of the center-right that once whinged about the Constitution and our sacred norms.

From https://www.unpopularfront.news/p/welcome-to-vichy-america . Read the whole thing.

How not to behave as a Democrat

My Congressional rep, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D), attended today’s Inauguration and posted happy selfies on her FB page. I would have understood if she had turned up wearing dark colored clothing, with a black arm band to mark the mourning for President Carter, and spoken of our debt to Martin Luther King for whom today is a national holiday. If she had approached it as a civic duty on behalf of her constituents, but one undertaken with regret.

But she didn’t.

#primary2026

“Mob” thinking among the oligarchs

This:

“The rich rabble is marked by the ‘corruptness’ which manifests in the fact that the rabble ‘takes everything for granted for itself’ because he denies the right to any of the ethical, legal, or statist institutions…[it assumes] an economically determined state of nature, in which it can also assume the economic right of the fittest.” It also believes in conspiracy, because it experiences itself politically as a conspirator, as part of a self-interested group only working for its own ends.

(Frank Ruda, quoted by John Ganz. )

Thoughts on personal social media strategy

Quite a few of my friends have been posting about their uncertainty about if and how to use social media going forward. Musk rendered X/Twitter toxic, and now Zuckerberg is capitulating to MAGA and abandoning moderation on Facebook. I posted the following as a comment on one of these threads, and decided to repeat it here:

I think the best approach is going to be dual-track: Bluesky plus personal blog. Longer form content on the blog, ephemeral interactions (plus notifications of blog updates) on Bluesky. (Or whatever supersedes Bluesky.) This is what folks like Scalzi and Emptywheel are doing.

What FB and Twitter have taught us is that relying on a single platform is risky/unwise/disappointing. Migrating old content is awful, but do you really want to lose your history? And setting up and running a WordPress instance is operationally trivial and pretty affordable.

Right now, I have four daily feed sources. (Too many, but 🤷?)
– Email, for all of the newsletters (including many Substack sources).
– Feedly, for all of the blogs and news sources that provide RSS feeds.
– Facebook, for family and friends.
– Bluesky, for ephemeral stuff.